We’ve taken a look at the policies, processes and structures FTSE 100 companies have in place to deliver on their promises to decarbonise. Find out what actions you can take from the UK’s largest companies to accelerate decarbonisation and transform your business.
While many companies have shared their ambitions to commit to a more sustainable future, they often fall short when it comes to their delivery plans.
FTSE 100 companies generally have a transition plan and a sustainability report, but the quality and comprehensiveness of outcomes and actions can vary. We found only one quarter (26) of the UK’s largest companies have comprehensive, measurable and specific actions that can be used to decarbonise.
So while there’s clear intention when it comes to committing to a more sustainable future, actions are lagging.
“Companies are now beginning to realise that they will be judged on their actions, not on their commitments. But the problem some find is the goals they’ve committed to are no longer achievable. By taking time to review and reset, companies can refocus efforts on what’s achievable and realistic for their business today and in the future.”
Toby Smith
Director, Sustainability, PwC UK
Typically, ESG timelines stretch far beyond business performance evaluation cycles, and beyond CEO tenures. Some executive boards are now in a position where they’ve inherited targets that now seem unachievable. Meanwhile, others are finding the complexity of gathering the robust and assured data needed to report and measure progress more challenging than it felt when goals were initially set. And with targets creeping closer, businesses are beginning to take ESG more seriously. By taking time to review and reset, companies can refocus efforts on what’s achievable and realistic for their business today and in the future.
Those getting ahead are reframing the way they think about ESG. By looking at the move to sustainable business practices as a route to growth, companies can create long-term value. Innovation in this area not only helps meet decarbonisation goals but also positions the company competitively in a market increasingly driven by environmental consciousness, and where investors are eyeing the risks and opportunities of sustainability.
The level of engagement in developing new products or services linked to decarbonisation depends on the company’s sector, strategy, and innovation capacity. More than three quarters of FTSE 100 companies have shown some level of innovation, with new products or services linked to decarbonisation, demonstrating the progress being made.
Almost all FTSE 100 companies have at least a satisfactory level of governance in place for their transition towards net zero. However, when it comes to the depth of change, not all are equally effective.
By building strong foundations: good governance around ESG, linking executive remuneration with sustainability targets, and delivering consistent, data-led sustainability reporting, companies are far more likely to succeed. By knowing you’ll be held accountable, you’re more likely to take action.
So what can we learn from FTSE 100 companies, and in particular, those doing it well?
Governance should involve all aspects of your business and crucially, your people. Once your people know what success looks like, they can help you to deliver. Taking a step further means embedding accountability by linking carbon emissions to remuneration. This approach ensures leaders are financially motivated to achieve sustainability goals, and while this is widespread among FTSE 100 companies, only 13 of the FTSE 100 companies have a mechanism we consider as exceptionally effective.
While almost three quarters of FTSE 100 companies have good or exceptional levels of ESG reporting, the primary focus is – understandably – compliance. Given the rise in mandatory requirements, such as the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), there’s a huge need for quality data around sustainability. By getting ahead of this need, businesses can use data to demonstrate their efforts around net zero progress as well as using it to inform wider decision-making and create value.
“The need for quality data around sustainability is high, and by ensuring data is transparent - and externally-assured - businesses can have more clarity on where they are, the impact of any actions they take, and be realistic about the journey they need to go on to reach their sustainability goals.”
Laura Kelly
Partner, Sustainability, PwC UK
Companies are starting to realise the strategic importance of embedding ESG into their business models. However, when announcing ambitious targets, many stall when it comes to producing comprehensive plans.
How can businesses take action to accelerate progress?
A comprehensive decarbonisation action plan outlines the specific strategies, steps and timelines a company will take to reduce its carbon emissions. These plans provide a roadmap for transitioning to a low-carbon economy, with clear targets, milestones and transparency in tracking progress.
Developing new products focused on sustainability involves creating goods and services that reduce carbon emissions or support a low-carbon economy.
Effective governance ensures sustainability is a priority for leadership, climate risk is integrated into decision-making, and all levels of the organisation are held accountable for meeting carbon reduction targets.
To incentivise change, decarbonisation-linked remuneration ties executive pay to ESG performance, particularly reducing carbon emissions. This approach ensures leaders are financially motivated to achieve sustainability goals, aligning their personal incentives with the company’s long-term environmental commitments.
Effective reporting ensures transparency, accountability, and stakeholder engagement, providing a clear picture of a company's sustainability efforts and outcomes.
Between August 2023 and August 2024, we analysed publicly available information from across the FTSE 100 to identify and analyse specific decarbonisation initiatives across key actions, including governance, action plans, remuneration, reporting and innovation. From here, we analysed and categorised each company based on internal parameters and graded each company accordingly.
Thanks to Severin Baker for his contribution to this analysis.